Reply to Jon Stewart dismissing Louis CK abuse allegations

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Jon Stewart dismissing Louis CK abuse allegations "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He didn't shut the guy down.  It was the last question.  The guy asking the question was conflating Cosby--who legal action had been taken against for a decade with unsubstantiated rumors at that point.

Jen kirkman's podcast was deleted for a year by the time the question was asked.

He didn't see the random, unspecified tweets.  That may have made him smile slightly b/c it was a dumb question.

Gawker was a gossip website--not a respected news source and defunct at the time.  Expecting him to on random page published a year prior on a defunct site by anonymous sources and not naming anyone specifically is ridiculous.

He did not try to make the audience laugh and cannot control what other people do.

If Stewart came out with the same response NOW, pile on.  He responded that it was important.  It is, but obsessing over this particular moment is not.[/quote]

You seem to have very poor social awareness.  Either that or your commenting on an entirely different youtube video.  The fact that you continue to insist on this version of the linked video despite it being posted above and everyone disagreeing with you is baffling.  It doesnt seem to be working well, either.  [/quote]

Everyone doesn't disagree with me.  Also you keep repeating  words like EQ and social awareness about me is a little like you doth protest to much.  Social cues are not lost on me.  you keep repeating is generalizations like smug and dismissive for Stewart but these adjectives apply to you by trying to belittle me.

Look at his face and listen to words actually said, then actually come up with a rebuttal that is based what is actually in the video.  Check your cognitive  distortions which are actually a thing.[/quote]

No, I keep repeating "EQ" because anyone with even the slightest level of it would be able to identify his interactions as being mocking and dismissive, and not respectful as you have absurdly tried to characterize them.

The consensus on this board and in the world in general is clear: Stewart's handling of this was very wrong.  I truly hope, if you think nothing is wrong with his reaction, and the social interaction you have perceived is so vastly different from what the rest of the world sees, you will consider questioning why your opinion of sociality is so far outside the norm.  Social issues would be a likely explanation.  [/quote]

Nice.

In case you need it, here's the sarcasm sign.  /s[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics