Reply to Wyoming mom of 5 who refused cancer treatment to have 6th child has passed away

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Wyoming mom of 5 who refused cancer treatment to have 6th child has passed away"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Her tumor grew back twice in a 3 month period. It was obviously an extremely aggressive cancer. There really is no way she had years left if she'd taken the treatment. At most, the treatment would have bought her a very sickly month or two.[/quote]

Exactly. It wasn't that dramatic of a choice; it was a pragmatic plan. [/quote]

Keeping your brain-dead, skull-less wife alive on life support to incubate the fetus wasn't a dramatic choice?!!?!?[/quote]

Not anymore than keeping her barely alive and suffering through chemo. [/quote]

again, chemo could have kept her alive longer and the baby gestating longer. [/quote]

She couldn't have done the chemo while pregnant.  [/quote]

YES she could have. There's research showing chemo and radiation after the first trimester are OK; and certainly preferable to a micro-preemie. [/quote]

Really. Shut up. Unless you are her oncologist, you have no idea WTf you are saying.  [/quote]
+1
There are no drugs that could have treated her cancer, pregnant or not. The poor lady was doomed to a fast death regardless of her pregnancy or treatment regimen.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics