Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Is DH trying to keep me down, or is he being reasonable?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The flip side is that you are saying that wearing pink is somehow the definition of "feminine." I disagree with that. It's great that you liked dolls and rockets. The reality is the main form of attention a lot of little girls get is around their looks, how pretty they are. There's a huge focus on being pretty and on what they wear. That has a negative effect, even on girls who like rockets as a kid, because it causes them over time to see their most important features (or the things other most define them by) as being tied to their appearance. You're entire argument assumes it's already settled what the definition of feminine is, what is "girl" stuff and what is "boy" stuff. Perhaps OP's husband is going to far in the other direction, but I actually think he's wise not to focus on "pretty" with his daughter. OP admitted he is loving toward her.[/quote] Would you feel better if I had worded my entire post using the phrasing "traditionally feminine" and "traditionally masculine". [Aside: Feminine=/=female and masculine=/=male, people are a mix of both characteristics.] My point is that people are not entirely one thing or the other...and I do see a strong tendency to undervalue what's traditionally "girl stuff". Obviously I don't ascribe to the view about what girls and boys are allowed to like...but, yes, I do think there is very strong cultural messaging that things like "pink" and "dolls" are girl things and "rockets" are boy things. My very existence challenges that notion, but it doesn't change the predominant cultural views. And I agree that it's good not to focus too much on *any* child's looks...but that wasn't the part I was referring to as should have been pretty clear from my post. The OP also said her DH dismisses things like dolls and pink as being silly. I strongly disagree with that as devaluing things that have traditionally been viewed as "girly" or, yes, "feminine".[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics