Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "What am I if I think Jesus was the best moral teacher ever but am indifferent re his divinity?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Hey PP, you still haven't answered a single question about your own theories: - why we should simply ignore the early accounts of Mark and Paul (apart from your less-than-convincing mumbling about picking and choosing), - where's proof the references to Jesus were "inserted" in Roman sources, and - who, exactly, created Jesus to control the masses with passion plays or scary gods or whatever else you keep mentioning without addressing this fundamental question about origin and "who benefited" in 55 AD. Not plausibly the Romans, not plausibly the Jewish leadership, not plausibly the folks who staged passion plays [i]after[/i] there was a decent audience for these plays. So who, then[/quote] I posted the op-ed about Kristoff and the evangelist. I'm still waiting for answers to the questions above. You atheists aren't exactly blowing us away with the caliber of your thought. Insulting other posters and Dickson is boring. Giving us your thoughts on what you think someone was thinking 2000 years ago is boring unless you're willing to back it up with even a modicum of logic. Insulting me and calling me "sensitive" is boring and misses the fundamental point that I don't care what you call me but I'd like to participate in an actual discussion with actual substance instead of ad hominems. Refusing to read Dickson's 1000 words is not only boring but childish. If you had read Dickson, you would not be able to deny that he has done excellent, specific, targeted rebuttals to Lataster. Clearly you two atheists have no interest in actual substance. Boring.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics