Reply to SCOTUS

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Although I agree with you in concept, OP, Trump is a one-term president.  He is already 70 himself.

Replacing Scalia should happen immediately, if not 9 months ago.  Replacing the others will probably happen sometime in the next 3 years.  The Republicans started a dumb precedent, though, of writing off the last year of the president's term.

[b]And, to be contrarian, "liberal" or "conservative" picks rarely work out as intended.[/b]  Pick a wise justice and leave the rest up to them.  [/quote]

This is so true. Many Presidents have seen justices rule in ways the Prez never imagined.  Chief Justice Roberts on the ACA is an example.[/quote]

Brennan is a better example. Appointed by a Republican as a "conservative" jurist. LOL [/quote]

You have your history wrong on Brennan.  Look it up. Eisenhower appointed Brennan, a Catholic Democrat, for political reasons, but never thought he was conservative.  This was before the SC itself was as political as it is today -- another nasty legacy of Roe v Wade. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics