Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]The Vansham lawsuit has now been raised to Judge Liman in multiple court documents in both the lively and Jones cases. I think it’s safe to say BF is going to take every opportunity for the rest of the case to remind the judge about the “misconduct” that took place. He first raised it in Jen Abel’s amended complaint against Jones. He then used it to deny BL’s lawyer’s request for interrogatories: they had asked for information about JB’s neurodivergence, JB’s lawyers asked “what’s the relevance of my client’s private health information” and Blake’s lawyers accidentally said “it’s in the discovery (referring to the vansham discovery)”. JB’s lawyers said why don’t you explain to the court how you obtained my clients private health information through a sham subpoena (I’m abbreviating they actually described the subpoena and why it was improper) and now this exchange is in BL’s motion to compel. Finally, they cite it in their response to Jones’s motion to quash a subpoena to the security company that took Jen Abel’s phone, extracted the texts and gave them to jones who gave them to BL. They seem to be alleging multiple crimes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics