Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One other thing that KatOrtega has noted is that Bryan Freedman is going to be a very, very busy boy over the next several months. His LA firm only has 20 attorneys, plus the 40 at the NY firm. He sometimes works with Mark Geragos but that firm is busy with the Diddy trial. And yet over the next few months, Freedman needs to deal with Lively discovery, a CA Court of Appeals brief for Rachel Leviss, oral arguments for same, an FKA Twigs trial this fall, an ethics hearing for Tom Sandoval (where Freedman and someone else reportedly told Sandoval he was missing a deadline although Sandoval had asked for an extension due to the fact that his lawyer had been let go), and an arbitration for Faith Stower. This is besides potential depositions and/or hearing on the MTDs in the Lively case, as well as other discovery disputes that arise here. Meanwhile, Lively does not have this problem, given the hundreds of attorneys at Quinn Emmanuel -- and they are not asking for extensions anymore, they are plowing through and (apparently) meeting deadlines, unlike Freedman. So I'm curious to see how things go for Freedman over the next few months and I eagerly await karma to catch up with him, although I'm not holding my breath yet. [/quote] I frequent the IEWU sub and have to constantly see Kat Ortega's breathless ramblings about Freedman, and now you have to summarize what she says and drag it over here. No thanks. [/quote] Not only is Quinn Emanuel not representing Blake, they are representing one of the defendants.[/quote] The represent Jones. There are a lot of firms involved in this case, I don't think we need to get dramatic when someone uses the wrong firm name here or there. This is a casual conversation (or should be).[/quote] Nobody is getting dramatic.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics