Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Trapped/Re-aging Families, How are you having the conversation?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]RAE exists. Older kids in an age cohort are favored due to their larger size, maturity, etc. Clubs are not incentivized to play younger players up for recruiting. Why? Because RAE exists. Those younger players playing up will be at a big disadvantage to being recruited (unless they are physically, technically, and all the other reasons the clubs have already stated as guideposts to playing up - which is what they do now). Where is the club incentive in that? Where is the parental incentive in having your kid play up with other kids that are up to 14 months older, only to be dominated by those older, bigger, faster, stronger kids? It really blows my mind that the person pushing for Aug/Sept kids to always play up on grade really believes what they are saying. It has to be a joke, right? And don't give me the "playing down a grade hurts recruiting!" College coaches evaluate kids based on their competition within a certain age range. If you're a standout in your age range, but in a different grade, you're going to be recruited. Also, and I'll end with this - large, established, big name clubs will do what they've already said they're going to do - stick with the age range and allow playing up to those ready. Not because of their grade. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics