Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can’t even be mad at people who get facts wrong in this case. I’m working and listening to the trial and when I read what the free Karen Read people say it is bananas and if you read only what’s on the Internet, you’ll get your stuff wrong. [/quote] I've been watching the trial and nothing so far shows she is guilty. The more I think about it the more I think he had a tragic fall, and people are acting shady bc they on some level all knew some harm came to him but they (including Karen) were all too drunk to truly consider going to find and help him, until it was too late.[/quote] I think is that she hit him with the car. She was so drunk that she only started realizing what she did hours later. I don’t know about you, but I’ve done this where I have drunk so much that different pieces of my memory come back the next day. That’s why I don’t drink anymore. But I don’t understand is why this man who is testifying today is being a difficult witness. [/quote] I don't drink so cannot speak to that, but the injuries just do not make sense, especially the fatal one, when it comes to her hitting him. In any case she did hit the tail light in the driveway (it's on video) so if you say it's a memory piece coming back then maybe she was remembering this mixed up with dropping him off mixed up with him not being anywhere. I think the same about Jen McCabe: she drunkenly remembered while in bed that Julie saw a "black blob" on the lawn and had this horrific sudden thought it might have been John. Same for the Albert butt dials: they noticed someone out, and decided it would be a bad look no matter what they did to not have helped the person earlier, so they did nothing. I really see it as a case of a bunch of drunks who left John out to die, with various degrees of cognizence of his situation and various reasons for doing nothing. To me it makes the most sense because otherwise nothing fits fully.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics