Reply to How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We already know she’s completely amoral.[/quote]

I find her repellent. A really bad person. Worse than Kavanaugh and that's saying something.[/quote]

:lol:  :lol: 
So much extremism here from the left.  It would be frightening if it wasn’t so amusing.[/quote]

I was predisposed to at least like her even if I don't agree with her judicial point of view, but I am heartily sick and tired of Saint Amy.

She can't express and opinion on whether the President has the absolute authority to pardon HIMSELF? Ben Sasse asks her a Constitutional law softball and she flails around? "Forgotten" disclosures about her record keep trickling out? She was also a part of the Bush recount? Come on.

She's a bought and paid for Federalist Society stooge. These hearings are an embarrassment and an insult to the public's intelligence.[/quote]

You would be saying exactly the same thing about anyone Trump nominated, period.  Nothing new under the sun.  [/quote]

Nope. While I think Kavanaugh and Gorsuch to some extent are the same they both had lengthy judicial records and Gorsuch actually worked at the best appellate firm in arguably the entire country before being appointed to the 10th Circuit. Kavanaugh was too political to ever be appointed tot eh federal bench and his temperament at his hearings soured me on him, but he has experience. Barrett has none of that - a short tenure at a law firm that merged with Baker Botts and then Notre Dame. She's the Sarah Palin of the judiciary. Sandra Day O'Connor she is not.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics