Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Private School Lacrosse Thread"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Looking at Wave 1-3- Politics plays an Obvious role. If for example you look at the Cumulative performance over high school for a school that already has 3 players selected, 2 of them should not of been even discussed let alone selected. POLITICS !!!!!!!!!!!!!! IMO [/quote] Two years ago endless whining and politics by all people related to Landon pulled their goalie onto this list in the last wave. Senate campaigns last year were less organized. Now, who was that kid again? Hard to place his name since he washed out of Hopkins lacrosse before fall ball ended in his 1st year. Landon has an outstanding team this year & those 3 kids are certainly very good players. That written, you wouldn't need to go out of the IAC or WCAC to make an argument for other kids locally...many of whom may be having a much better season than kids named to it. That's lacrosse. [/quote] The goalie picked before him was going to army and couldn't play in the game because he had army commitments, the Landon goalie was second in line, not politics. Also, what do his off the field issues that caused him to leave hopkins have to do with the validity of his selection based on his HS performances. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics