Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I really don't get the personal animus shown here towards Freedman.  Gottlieb has been far more nasty in his pleadings, and refusing to agree to a first request for an extension is not normal practice.  Being a bit of a blowhard is pretty much a character trait for plaintiff attorneys and will be something the judge sees day in and day out.  It certainly isn't something that will "turn him against" Freedman as one poster hopes.[/quote]

I wouldn't say I have "personal" animus towards Freedman, but as a lawyer I've known many like him and it's one of the reasons I left litigation. It is not a style or personality type I enjoy, so I'm predisposed to dislike him. Also early in following this case, I read this profile of him (from last summer), and there's a lot of details in there that give me the ick:

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/entertainment-lawyer-bryan-freedman-hollywood-dark-knight-1235919993/

I do think he's an effective lawyer for the kind of cases he takes on and I don't think he's dumb. But I cannot stand his approach to the media and I find his personality grating.

I also happened to have a lot of respect for Gottlieb based on some of his prior pro bono work (for instance defending GA poll workers against attacks from Giuliani after the 2020 election) and his style is preferable to me -- more restrained and professional IMO.

I just don't enjoy bombastic lawyers unless they are funny. Freedman is a specific kind of litigator, a media-savvy pitbull. I've known others like him. It is effective but I don't enjoy it. That's all.[/quote]

What sort of law do you practice if you left litigation?

I will argue that bringing this case in the first place for BL wasn’t particularly restrained or professional of Gottlieb. It’s a crap case and he hasn’t done right by his client. But he’s certainly making a boatload off of this.

It’s nice he does pro bono work and all, but that’s par for the course at big firms, they’re expected to. And he obviously chose something that would bring good PR to the firm. I don’t think his motivations were as charitable as you assume. [/quote]

If Gottlieb had anything to do with the VanZan sham litigation, and I think he did, that is a million degrees worse than anything Freedman did.   And just to cut off the inevitable responses, it was a sham because (1) the entity of the defendants were known, and Doe defendants should not have been used, and (2) Van Zan had no standing with respect to any of the claims it purported to bring.[/quote]

And 3) Baldoni and his co-dependants were never notified about the Vanzan suit. [/quote]

Yes another good point.  Blake’s lawyers should be sanctioned for this, but let’s hear more about how Freedman is too bombastic.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics