Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree with we poster who said the lively supporter was victim blaming Baldoni. Why should Baldoni have been put in the situation? It’s absolutely miserable what they did. Why should he be forced to go to their penthouse for meetings? It’s a power move.

That text about Taylor and Ryan being on her dragons was threatening - essentially you want them on your side and you definitely don’t want them not on your side. That’s what Taylor ended their friendship over according to the media - she felt used.

You are blaming Justin for “giving in” but i don’t see where he had a choice. I think connecting him with the trainer was another power move. Same with lying to him about Ryan’s company taking over the marketing for free and then charging them.

These are nasty, deceitful people. I don’t blame Justin. [/quote]

This is just silly. Somehow pro-Baldoners are telling Lively that it’s part of her job as an actress to accept and not complain about unscripted kissing and nudity scenes that are outside the norm, but yet Baldoni as the actual director of the film didn’t really have any responsibility for the situations either that he created by springing on unannounced intimacy or nudity, or that he allowed by letting Lively have more power than he was actually comfortable with. To you he only gets credit, no blame.

This includes the situation where I believe he took underage actors like Ferrer, filmed an unscripted intimate scene, and then remarked “I know I’m not supposed to say this, but that was hot” or similar at the end of it.  I believe that’s one of the scenes that Lively took out of the final cut of the film.

You just overlook this stuff from Baldoni and it’s actually problematic, but to you everything bad adheres to Lively not Baldoni. It’s weird.[/quote]

Ferrer wasn't underage. She was 21 or 22 I think when she filmed. Also the scene where Baldoni allegedly said the comment about practicing the scene was scripted to be a sex scene. He wasn't adding in intimacy that wasn't scripted. The allegation is that he added a shot where Ferrer's character (who is the younger version of Lively's character) is supposed to climax on screen during the scene, something that was not apparently in the original script and that Ferrer *allegedly* felt uncomfortable with (we haven't heard from her, this is based on Lively's complaint, I am not saying this is what happened), and also that he made these comments afterward that Lively alleges crossed a line of professionalism.

No comment on whether any of this happened or whether that could be part of a sexual harassment claim (I truly just don't know, I wasn't there, I don't practice that kind of law) but just wanted to correct the facts here.[/quote]

Actually crazy to constantly claim the pro-Lively side deals in facts unlike the pro-Baldoni side, only to go around and claim underage actors on this set were doing sex scenes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics