Reply to WH announces construction of 90,000 sq foot ballroom to WH

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "WH announces construction of 90,000 sq foot ballroom to WH"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]So sad what’s become of the White House and our own failing Washington Post — this from The Editorial Board. (Nobody I know has a sub any longer which is why it moved to Apple News to better spread its propaganda). Read and weep for the paper that was storied journalism:

[b]In defense of the White House ballroom -
Donald Trump vs. the NIMBYs[/b]

“The teardown of the White House’s East Wing this week is a Rorschach test. Many see the rubble as a metaphor for President Donald Trump’s reckless disregard of norms and the rule of law, a reflection of his willingness to bulldoze history and a temple to a second Gilded Age, paid for by corporate donors. Others see what they love about Trump: A lifelong builder boldly pursuing a grand vision, a change agent unafraid to decisively take on the status quo and a developer slashing through red tape that would stymie any normal politician.

In classic Trump fashion, the president is pursuing a reasonable idea in the most jarring manner possible. Privately, many alumni of the Biden and Obama White Houses acknowledge the long-overdue need for an event space like what Trump is creating. It is absurd that tents need to be erected on the South Lawn for state dinners, and VIPs are forced to use porta-potties.”

…

“Preservationists express horror that Trump did not submit his plans to their scrutiny, but the truth is that this project would not have gotten done, certainly not during his term, if the president had gone through the traditional review process. The blueprints would have faced death by a thousand papercuts.”

…

“Many homeowners have become red-pilled by their struggles to navigate the slow-as-molasses maze of government bureaucracy…”

…

“Though the fundraising for the ballroom creates problematic conflicts of interest, two examples validate Trump’s aggressive approach. After a fence jumper got inside the White House in 2014, it was obvious that better perimeter fencing needed to be installed. But doing so involved five public meetings of the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) over two years, as members took pains to ensure the fencing complied with environmental rules. Construction didn’t begin until July 2019.”

https://apple.news/ADnRY2hihTHOtsIXeq9_AqQ

They go on to say that D-Day was planned in six months. Yup! Yes, government is slow for a reason, so people can’t bulldoze the White House! Now we have an ugly @ss  concrete perimeter around it that makes us look like a developing nation.

The Washington Post knows exactly which countries do things fast: authoritarian countries like China who bribe their way into it and don’t care about safety regulations in the building of it or aftermath.

Sad.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics