Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "RBG Politcal Discussion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In reality, there are only two rules, both set forth in the Constitution: A president, for as long as he or she is president, has the power to nominate a person to fill a Supreme Court seat; and that nominee can fill the seat only with the advice and consent of the Senate. That’s it. Everything else is posturing. Everything else is politics.[/quote] With McConnell's rule the Supreme Court can sit empty indefinitely. Is that Constitutional? Is that politics?[/quote] Still waiting on an answer to this. No one?[/quote] Not PP but the above analysis seems logical. So, the answer to both questions would be yes. Elections have consequences. [/quote] But the Constitution outlines the duties of the Supreme Court. They can't be fulfilled if the court is empty. [/quote] So, I guess we would have a lot of circuit court splits in your hypothetical. Or maybe you could eventually vote McConnell and his party out before you run out of justices. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics