Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Neither the prosecution nor the defense are against the dismissal of the case against Flynn.[/quote]

There's only one reason not to dismiss the charges.

Starts with a J. Ends with an Ustice.

[b]DOJ proved the facts of the case, Flynn swore to them, the judge accepted them, and Flynn has awaited sentencing for several years. [/b]

Then new prosecutors said the law is different (it's not) and to drop the charges.  Very unusual.  Would it be right to agree? How? [/quote]

We don't have a Justice System.   We have a Legal System.   You didn't get the memo?[/quote]

No.  It appears they extracted a guilty plea under false pretenses: a threat to prosecute his son after he spend millions on legal fees.
The prosecutor did not turn over exculpatory information--to include the fact that the 302 was edited by people who were not legally supposed to do so.
There was much exculpatory information found in the documents by the US Attorney Jensen.  Information that Van Grack did not turn over.
The initial interview with the FBI agents was not based on a crime.  The day before the FBI was going to close the case, but Strozk made them keep it open.  (the insurance policy, perhaps?)  Therefore the "lie" was not material.  And, whether he lied is questionable, in any case.

Why didn't van Grack turn over the exculpatory information when it was ordered?  [/quote]

Good summary.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics