Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m a Lively defender and the Tik Tok muting seems weird to me. Was this really done by a Lively person because they were afraid of what’s in there?  Wasn’t it just stuff other people were saying and repeating on Reddit — I don’t really understand what purpose silencing NAG on this accomplishes?  If anything, won’t just make her put out more videos, and be more anti-Lively?

I am open to the idea that this was something Lively’s team did for some reason.  I just don’t understand how it could possibly benefit them, and wouldn’t obviously harm them more.[/quote]

Agree with this. I'm really curious because since it's multiple creators, that seems coordinated by Lively or her supporters, but it also really makes no sense to do it (it's out there anyway and Freedman brought it up now in Abel's case) but Lively has done other things that didn't make sense to me so it's entirely possible. I'd love to know the motivation of whoever did it.

Lively and Jones have both stated in pleadings, without being asked, that there was a subpoena so it doesn't make sense to do that and then be cagey about it, knowing it would surely come up in discovery. They do seem defensive about it though (and they should because I'm of the opinion it looks shady).[/quote]

They could not deny the existence of the subpoena because they told the N.Y. Times it existed, which was the reassurance the N.Y. Times needed to include the texts in its article.  I doubt they were thinking that the actual litigation against Wayfarer would be vigorously defended at that time.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics