Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Common Core's epic fail: Special Education"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]CCSS.Math.Content.3.NBT.A.1 Use place value understanding to round whole numbers to the nearest 10 or 100. If lots of third-graders are currently unable to meet this standard, should we throw out the standard? Or should we improve math education, so that in the future, most third-graders will be able to meet this standard? [/quote] I don't think this is the type of standard that people are complaining about. This is clear. Many are not. And, I would think that most third graders already do this. [/quote] If most third-graders already do this, then there won't be a problem on this part of the test, right? But I wish that somebody would provide an example of the type of standard that people are complaining about. How about this first-grade math standard? Is it clear? CCSS.Math.Content.1.MD.B.3 Tell and write time in hours and half-hours using analog and digital clocks. (Keeping in mind that first-graders don't take the NCLB tests.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics