Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Riverbend FC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let's just all be for real here for a second. RbFC's big plan is they have a pathway to GA Aspire? So glad my daughter’s team dodged that bullet and did not follow her coach to that club.[/quote] No, they will basically be Aspire, with a pathway to GA. [/quote] Which means no teams below u13, no second girls teams in an age group, and no boys? Or are they just going to pay Loudoun to continue to access NCSL? And practice in a big Great Falls backyard? And in terms of this "pathway," does RbFC's technical director have a voice at NVA in any formal way, or will this be structured even more favorably to NVA than GFR's failed NVA alliance? So much time, so little information.[/quote] I don’t understand people’s obsession with this pathway. Anyone at any club has a pathway when they get to that age group by going and trying out at any club. Being part of Loudoun doesn’t guarantee you continuing on that top pathway. Having a pathway is one thing, a player developing at that top level is another. Kids will play anywhere and learn, develop and stay with friends until they get to play 11v11 then move to bigger clubs for those leagues. The pre-ECNL, and pre-MLS Next teams are a bunch of letter, means absolutely nothing. GFRs Pre-ECNL 2015 boys should be division 12 NCSL but they are labeled just because GFR pays to be in ECNLR[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics