Reply to Field hockey clubs feedback

Forum Index » Sports General Discussion

Reply to "Field hockey clubs feedback "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think we can all agree that the Wolves victory over WC post did not age well. It’s the only game they have won so far, and that WC team  might be the only team in the entire U 19 to go 0-4. [/quote]

WW u19 stacked with committed players and still can’t win their pool (lower tier) and have not won any major regional or national level tournament in the past few years.  Committed players to Columbia, Syracuse, Farfield, BU, Davidson, Lafayette, Amherst, Longwood.  Also, the team has so many players, the lower tiered players were combined with another club to play at this tournament not coached by WW or under WW team name.  So clearly it was WW top team.  You would think if the goal like WC eagles is for players who are uncommitted to showcase, WW would have left their committed players at home so the other players could play under the WW name along with a team they practice with and be coached by WW coaches versus be out in a random team or stand on the sidelines “cheering” or as the coach would say “learning by watching the better players” play.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics