Reply to Why are people more sympathetic to Lindsay Clancy than Andrea Yates? (Child death mentioned)

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Why are people more sympathetic to Lindsay Clancy than Andrea Yates? (Child death mentioned)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If she knew her kids were dead, why wasn’t her next question, “what happened to them”? Why was the next question “do I need a lawyer?” She knew exactly what she did and she was well aware of what she was doing, when she was doing it. [/quote]

Psychosis also doesn’t necessarily impair memory.

The denial in this thread about this symptom is really astounding.[/quote]

Sounds to me like psychosis is pretty damn impossible to prove.[/quote]

It can also be very hard to disprove. And that is much more true when someone alleging it has recently been on three different antipsychotic medications, among many others.[/quote]

Well in this case the burden is on the defense to prove psychosis. The prosecution merely has to prove that she killed the kids. That doesn't seem too hard at this point. It will be on the defense to prove she was suffering from psychosis. Not on the state to prove that she wasn't. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics