Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The Twitter Files"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Saw some locked thread with another half-assed "Twitter Files" story by Taibbi attacking "Hamilton68" which was an attempt to use algorithms to identify Russian bots on Twitter. The claim seems to be that it was then used to ban a bunch of American users. Yet the list of users hasn't been made available to know whether or not they were Americans, or bots, or whatever. So we're supposed to just take Taibbi on his word? (also - as a side note, if you don't want to be confused for a Russian bot, stop amplifying their talking points)[/quote] pretty certain that the claim is that it was erroneously used to ban users who weren’t, actually, “Russian bots.” Taibbi’s got the receipts.[/quote] If Taibbi has the receipts, he isn't coherently or convincingly delivering them.[/quote] Sure he is. Obviously, he can’t release all the names yet, without permission. [/quote] Don't need names, just need twitter handles... which are PUBLIC. [/quote] I imagine he’ll release them in due course. I think another key point is that twitter, itself, in most cases, disagreed that accounts were “Russian bots” as alleged.[/quote] If he has the receipts, he needs to provide them. Not "in due course." "In due course" only tells me that he does not in fact have the receipts in hand.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics