Reply to new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Talking off the record is different from saying the reporters have to affirmatively say that he did not speak to them.

You can say he declined to speak on the record, and that is literally true. You cannot say he declined to speak at all and still be telling the truth.[/quote]

How do we know that the two reporters are telling the truth.  [b]They haven't exactly been forthright throughout this process.[/[/b]quote]

And, they even kind of walked back that statement.  And, people also talk to reporters on background which is even a step back from "off the record."  And, FWIW, if you are "off the record," how do you attribute statements to an individual.

These reporters are a runaway train.

First, one of them acted like she didn't write the tweet--which she later admitted, but assumed it would be edited or something?
Then, they didn't omit the key piece of information from the op-ed?  Which is pretty questionable.
Next, Kavanaugh had told them he would speak to them and backed out because he wanted them to "lie."  Now, that is itself a "lie."
They failed to mention that Stier worked for Clintons and that his wife failed to get the federal judgeship because the Obama appointment "expired" when Trump was elected.

And, they believe Ramirez because of their "gut feelings."  Really?  Reporters?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics