Reply to Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's funny that Trumpkins are delighted at the thought of "punishing" sanctuary cities by sending illegal immigrants to us ...

You do realize that sanctuary cities are by and large cities where immigrants - both legal and illegal - ALREADY live. They are already here. And many of our communities are rallying to make it possible for them to live their fullest lives and become contributors to our regions. It's not a punishment - it's the American way. [/quote]

Exactly - it’s NOT a punishment.  So why are Democrats so very outraged??  They should be tickled pink.[/quote]

For the 100000th time...

It’s not that Dems think it’s a punishment, it’s that Trump and Miller sat down to think of a way to punish Dems for the ICE funding for beds. Trump thinks it’s a punishment he can inflict on Dems in retaliation for budget negotiations.

I think he should go ahead with his plan. If ICE doesn’t have the funds for the buses he should loan out his campaign buses and take full credit for his plan. It would certainly make him look like a compassionate guy.

[/quote]

Yes, we know - you've repeated your spiel for the 100000th time.  The point you seem to be deliberately avoiding is:  [b]SO WHAT if Trump thought it would be a "punishment"?  [/b]Many of you have repeatedly said it would *not* be a punishment to receive these immigrants.  Though I question how many of you actually live in the targeted sanctuary cities - easy for you to say how much they'd be welcome if you're not even living there.

Finally, what's your explanation as to why Democrats refused funding for ICE beds?  If beds are needed, why are they not being funded by the very people who insist these migrants are so welcome here?
[/quote]
POTUS planning punishment for citizens of the his own country is OK in your books?? Seriously???
[/quote]

Oh, for crying out loud.  You are completely unable to carry on a normal conversation.  The fact is:  sanctuary cities (and Democrats in general) are insisting this would be no punishment at all for them, and that they would happily welcome a large influx of immigrants.  It's not as if they've announced that it *would* be a punishment.  So if they're assuring the country that it's no problem for them, then we should take them at their word.  Can even a tiny part of your brain comprehend this, or are you going to continue beating this into the ground?  [/quote]

I agree with that PP - the POTUS sitting down to brainstorm ways to punish US citizens over budget negotiations is deplorable. But I guess that what ya’ll like about him. You certainly have no issue with it.

[/quote]

Here's a question that still hasn't been answered (since you brought up budget negotiations):  why did Democrats deny funding for more ICE beds?  Riddle me that.[/quote]

I’ll gladly answer after 46 pages of deflection.  :lol: 
[/quote]

It was asked many pages back, and we're still waiting for our answer - which you don't have.  [/quote]

“Why do you care? It doesn’t matter WHY Dems deny funding.” Isn’t that your line?  :lol:

[/quote]

So no answer.  It's reprehensible that the very people saying immigrants are welcome here aren't even approving funding for much-needed beds.  Then don't complain when these immigrants are put on buses and either a) deported or b) delivered to sanctuary cities.  Serves you right.[/quote]

Sorry, I need 46 pages before I’ll answer. What page did you first ask?

[/quote]

No worries, the answer is clear as day.  Democrats refused funding for more ICE beds because every one of you is a huge hypocrite.  Speaking of [b]doing something purely out of spite[/b] - that would be Democrats to a t.  We have our answer.[/quote]

But but but...”the intent doesn’t matter”...

46 f#cking pages. Pathetic. 
[/quote]

Ah, so you agree that Democrats withheld the funding purely out of spite.  Interesting that you accuse Trump of doing what the Democrats DID FIRST.[/quote]

Not at all. I’ll explain in 40 pages. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics