Reply to Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Anybody following the Karen Read trial in Boston?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think she was blacked out and realized she was so drunk after she came to on the couch that she suddenly wondered if she had somehow hit him or … who knows. I’m confused about the whole going into the after party thing. They must have gotten into a fight on the way there - they were all happy at the bar and her explanation about why she didn’t go in is odd. Also, if she was waiting for him to go in that was a super short wait? I honestly think if she hit him she just didn’t know. She was wasted. But I also don’t think she had any intent to kill him. She thought he was sleeping with someone else in her voicemails! She didn’t hit him on purpose. There’s no way. She’s guilty of maybe manslaughter at most and they have not established it. [/quote]

Yep. This is the scenario that makes the most sense. There is no evidence that Mr. O’Keefe was hit by a car since his injuries didn’t comport with being struck. 
[/quote]

Ridiculous.

Defendant's own ARCCA witness testified his injuries were consistent with being knocked down by a vehicle and sustaining fatal head injury.

Medical examiner testified his injuries were both inconsistent AND CONSISTENT with a pedestrian strike by motor vehicle - i.e., some such incidents result in anomalies re: injury pattern. She also testified, as did the treating ER physician, that he exhibited no signs of being in an altercation i.e. FIGHT.[/quote]

His DNA on her tail light HOUSING. His hair frozen to the lift gate of the SUV. Tiny pieces of her tail light in his clothing.

OPEN YOUR EYES![/quote]
YOU ARE NOT A SERIOUS PERSON[/quote]

I think that poster is very serious about their extremely strong feelings about this trial, and they feel especially strongly that they know who did it and how it happened. And they very much want to see a particular outcome to this trial. They appear to have very intense and personal feelings about this trial. [/quote]

I’m a 54 year old attorney who has been both a defender and a prosecutor.

I’m outraged and sickened by what has been done in this case by media manipulation both by the defense team and by numerous monetizers on social media and how they have all victimized the victims family and friends and the innocent witnesses whose only ‘crime’ was inviting a friend to a party, or offering to help a friend find a missing friend, or being a first responder or investigator at the scene. Also the prosecutors office and judge have been vilified and falsely accused of corruption.

This case is a canary in the coal mine for what social media true crime obsessives can do to disrupt our justice system.

Also after decades of experience with disordered personalities in professional and personal settings, I can see very clearly what a malignant narcissist the defendant is and would absolutely like to see her held accountable for her crimes by a jury of her fellow citizens.
[/quote]

This is like people villainizing the Ramseys about JonBenet’s murder bc they were weird people who do and say strange things. You can be weird, mentally ill, unlikable and innocent. That goes for KR and the whole crew. The sad thing is John might have died accidentally and it’s just a senseless tragedy with no guilty party.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics