Reply to Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So I’m the OP of the other thread on today’s testimony. I’m reading the transcript and I’m in tears reading that section about Beau and about Charlottesville. I believe Biden when he says he felt compelled to run for those reasons. I believe that Biden is a decent man. My heart goes out to him for all of the loss he’s experienced. And he certainly knows when his son passed. It’s crude that we are splitting hairs over such a personal thing.

Yet, I can still see the rationale that Hur’s intention was to provide the justification for his findings. Without it, could Biden have been found to have acted with malicious intent? 
With the commentary on Biden’s memory, it absolves him (if not exonerates him). Or so goes the report’s findings. And this is a reasonable argument.

Because I can see the logic, and there is no evidence to support political motivation, and I cannot read minds, I cannot get down with the Hur witch-hunt. I don’t see any basis for legal action or disbarment or any of the crazy cries I’ve heard today. There is just no basis at all.

I do think the “can’t even remember his son’s death…” comment was very insensitive and tactlessly sensational. Could that have been interpreted from the exchange? Maybe from someone a little short on empathy and EQ.  But is it illegal? No. Nefarious? Don’t know without reading Hur’s mind but there’s no evidence of it.

Sounds like a lot of you are just parroting Schiff’s testimony. I just can’t see how any thinking person, legal scholar or practitioner could take the position that many of you have.

We’ve really lost our way when it comes to approaching life with reason and without bias. I hope we find it again. [/quote]
This is a failure of critical thinking.
Biden wasn’t charged,  because there wasn’t evidence to support it.
The end.
[img]The only reason to include language disparaging the president, was to score political points.
Hur couldn’t deliver the goods to the Republicans legally, so he gave them cheap (and lying) talking points.[/img]
I’m not posting about disbarment or jail, but let’s be clear- Hur did his job for the right wing establishment and echo chamber, was it illegal? Probably Not. Was it entirely unethical? Yes.
And he’ll pop his weaselly head up in another year, and live to chip away at our rule of law another day.  
Because the democrats and institutions have still not come to terms with what the republicans have become.[/quote]

Where is the evidence to support this claim? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics