Reply to I’m a liberal democrat horrified by the current Dr Seuss drama and normalization of censorship

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "I’m a liberal democrat horrified by the current Dr Seuss drama and normalization of censorship "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

Exactly! You are well within your rights to criticize the decision. And I fully support that right.

But when posters like OP say this is "censorship" (not you, I think), that isn't a matter of opinion. That is factually wrong. [/quote]
That may be technically true, but part of the problem here is that this is now a widespread cultural phenomenon.  Many people say "times change" and that's true, but this change is so new that we don't have a widely accepted word for it yet.  Calling it "publisher's rights" doesn't capture it because it isn't really about their rights and it's way bigger than just publishing.  "Cancel culture" is a better term, but that's too perjorative.  What do you think it is? [/quote]

So a publisher cancelling their own books is "cancel culture?"

How about you take over the publishing of money-losing books and start subsidizing the publisher?[/quote]
I really doubt they were losing money.  Those books cost nothing to print and sales were low but steady.  Furthermorez they actually purpose was to keep Seuss's books in print. Plus they said that they cancelled book because the specific images were racist.  So why are you making up a story that this was strictly a money decision?

As I said, "cancel culture" is not a good term.  But we have no other term for "removing a statement or image from social circulation due to the perception of racism, whether voluntarily or involuntarily."

Whatever that is, it's less than 10 years old and growing fast.  They were isolated cases before that.  There were other reasons things get "cancelled." But this particular reason and social process is new.[/quote]

Why do you consider voluntary acts part of cancel culture? Isn't the point of cancel culture that the person or company faces negative consequences - boycotts, mean Tweets, etc - if they don't stop engaging in behavior that others find problematic?

Unless you can point to any evidence that the Seuss family was pressured into taking these books out of circulation, all of this handwringing about Dr Seuss' books being cancelled is just another culture war wedge issue contrived by Republicans. Voluntarily taking books with racist caricatures out of circulation because they do not honor Dr Seuss' legacy is hardly an example of cancel culture.[/quote]
Forget the name!  Look at the definition.  That's new.  Simply unheard of ten years ago.  Nobody did that.  That's why we still print Mein Kampf and you can buy it on Ebay.  It's the most racist book in history. Nobody ever thought to cancel it.[/quote]

Who is "we"? Who exactly is printing it? [/quote]
Oh brother.  So you actually are perfectly okay with the printing and promoting of racist ideas?[/quote]

I'm a DP (sorry forgot to put that), and no. My point was that the PP is wrong. The original publisher of MK is not still printing it. It actually was cancelled, the copyright holder refused to publish it anymore, until the copyright expired and someone new picked it up an annotated it in 2016, and many bookstores still refuse to shelve the annotated reprint. Also, if PP got it off of Ebay, someone is selling is second hand, just like they can do with all the other out of print books. So PP was wrong, people did cancel MK (and rightly so).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics