Reply to FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review Updates"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ The decision to purchase a new high school (KAA) in the middle of the process and then play dumb about the implications of that acquisition for the ongoing boundary review only further underscores the deep incompetence of those currently running FCPS or charged with its oversight. [/quote]

Strongly disagree.  It is the only competent thing they have done lately.  Some of the worst boundaries suggested by THRU are in this area.  And the boundaries in this area are like a spider web--they have been adjusted in this manner because there was no where else to go.
This is the area that needs the space.

If the School Board were smart, they would take advantage of the KAA decision and drop this current boundary study.  It gives them a great excuse to do so.  They will necessarily need to make adjustments in boundaries due to KAA, but there are logical options that do not involved splitting neighborhoods down the middle and sending kids thirty minutes away.  [b]It should enable school communities[/b].[/quote]

Right? This is the only smart thing FCPS has done in ages. It just makes so much sense, now middle schools can all go to the same high school and not be split up. All of Carson can go to the KAA building, all of Stone can go to Westfield, all of Hughes can go to South Lakes, all of Franklin can go to Chantilly. It just makes sense. [/quote]

Agree.[/quote]

It will not quite work that way, but it should be an improvement.[/quote]

Of course it won't work that way, because not everyone who currently goes to Carson is likely to end up at KAA, and Stone is not big enough to be the sole feeder to Westfield. [b] But the people who want the KAA purchase to go through don't want to acknowledge any possible complications or messiness associated with new boundaries for a school at the KAA site[/b], because they see that as potentially souring someone on the deal.  It's a bit childish, especially when just about everyone is in favor of the purchase.  [/quote]
I don't see how turning 4 way and 3 way split feeders into 2 way splits is a complication or messiness.  An improvement is an improvement.  One poster is trying to say "all Carson to KAA" likely because they are at Fox Mill ES (which goes to Carson) and want to go to KAA instead of South Lakes.  
It would be nice to hear from the school board how KAA will affect the expansion plans at Centreville and other spending going forward, but acting like that had to be figured out before making the purchase is why you get so much resistance to your posts.  It's blatantly obvious that they got a great deal on a school that had been needed and planned for a long time - and one that solves more problems than those future projects that may or may not be delayed.  I doubt the school board gives us any answers about future budgets until next year's CIP update forces them to put it in writing.  It sucks, but complaining about it incessantly here won't make it happen any sooner.[/quote]

You’re conflating multiple posters who’ve suggested FCPS would be better served by addressing, or at least acknowledging, some fairly basic questions associated with the KAA purchase.

All I’ll add at this point is that when you suggest that FCPS deserves nothing but unmitigated praise for proceeding as it has with this deal you come across as both selfish and also dismissive of those who’d expect more transparency from School Board members who’ve spent years telling people they are cash strapped and can’t possibly fund needed projects in other parts of the county - only to suddenly commit to spending at least $150 million on this school (and we all know the final number will be higher).

[b]Again, most intuitively see the logic for this acquisition, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t be providing more details as to where the money will come from, what other projects will be bumped, and how it will affect a boundary review that had already been underway for well over a year.  They’ve had time now to come up with answers, or at least commit to providing them, and basically are just leaving people guessing instead.  That’s not good governance. [/quote][/b]

It seems to me that things are progressing as they should.  I have not seen any indication that they have closed on the sale yet.  I would think that we will here more after that.

Now, let's just say this went the way some think it should have:

The first I knew KAA was closing was on DCUM--specifically: February 13 is when it was first posted here.
When did SB become aware?  I don't know.
But, let's just say, it was presented at the next SB meeting.  How would you think they should have done it?  Mateo:  "Gee, I hear KAA is for sale.  Should we buy it?"  "How much should we pay?"

Sure.  When there is a house for sale in your neighborhood --and a lot of interest in it--you would announce to everyone that you are interested in purchasing it?  What do you think would happen?  Would you get it at a good price or would the price go up with competitive bidders?

It has not been that long since they announced this.  We will get answers.  You may or may not like them, but we will get them.  
My guess is that it may scale back a renovation or delay it a year.  They may be able to use one of the extra buildings to fill some other real estate needs of the system and save money there.

Have you written your School Board member and asked how they are going to pay for it?[/quote]

They didn’t have to announce their interest prior to voting to acquire KAA, but they could have come up with some answers or at least acknowledged the questions that needed to be answered when they voted on the purchase or in the weeks that have followed.

They didn’t, which led to multiple SB members abstaining from the vote to purchase KAA, questions from BRAC members and community groups that remain unanswered, and continued uncertainty as to FCPS’s plans for KAA.

The latter doesn’t speak well to the School Board’s commitment to transparency and good governance. Nor is it necessarily in the interests of those who want the KAA property to become a neighborhood school, since it invites others to continue weigh in that a new school should serve a different purpose, as illustrated in this recent article:

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/citizens-federation-has-a-vision-for-fcps-property-purchase/article_8e02236a-b066-48cf-b6ee-72c24d030d4c.html

[/quote]

Why is there a whole article about the vision for KAA that some group no one has heard of has? Fairfax Times needs to do better.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics