Reply to Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like this discussion could use some grounding in numbers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the actual Option H involves:

- 1800 existing Wootton students +
- About 400 additional students 
= 2200 students in the Crown building

Is that correct? [/quote]
No, 1900 Wootton students  +500ish in crown/fields road per option table [/quote]

Again, Fields Road is not at Wootton/Crown in option H.[/quote]

And again, it makes logical sense for them to go to Crown as it was and still should be their school. It was for them. The gaithersburg community is highly opposed to option H and have made it clear that the only way they might accept it is if fields road is added. Don’t be so focused on what is in option H in written form. There is so much more.

IMO-I think there is literally no chance Wootton moves to Crown. There is simply not enough support for it and it’s making MCPS look so bad (I mean if they could actually look worse). [/quote]

Gaithersburg was promised a school.  It is unfair to take it away for some rich families who are complaining when no other school is offered that.  [/quote]

Reading all posts conclude that Wootton HS is not in a bad shape as they claim for to the public. They don't want new Crown HS, and that means they better not to complain further to the public that MCPS do not hear them or ignore them. Gaithersburg probably do not mind getting a new Crown HS no matter if Wootton is moving there or not. It is just that the public resource "Crown HS" could be more better used effectively, efficiently and timely in option H. [/quote]
I think you posted like at least dozens of times of the same comments. Seriously Wootton in a bad shape is not equivalent to accepting closing the school and merge to a new school. 
[/quote]PP gets it.  They just want to see  a W school destroyed.[/quote]

You over value your w schools. Most of us don’t care.  Some of us choose not to put our kids in those environments as we came from them and know the culture isn’t healthy.

What I do care about is the lack of equity in terms of course offerings, facilities and stuff.  Our kids shouldn’t have to go without science labs, sports equipment and uniforms, music and theater, photography and other things while your kids have access to it.

So, while our kids go without and are in equally bad facilities you want to shift more funding to your schools vs allow all kids safe environments and have access to what they need.

We could comfortably pay cash for a new home to go to a W school but it’s the culture and attitudes that keeps us where we are at.  [/quote]

This is a work of fiction. Nobody who  could provide better for their kids would choose not to. Give me a break. [/quote]

[b]Define better[/b]?  You need to look at the full picture and not just your ego.  I very purposefully picked where we lived as I grew up in a w school and it’s not what we wanted.  Except for the lack of offerings, my kids are happy at their schools and the schools are much more down to earth.  And less competition for college.  [/quote]Not getting shanked or shot in the school bathroom.

You're welcome.[/quote]

You do know violent things happen at every school, including w schools, right?[/quote]

Except WAY less often and less severe. And also with actual consequences not just from law enforcement but from parents. And I’m specifically referring to VIOLENCE not drugs. Because I know that will probably be your next comment. I’ll take the risk of someone trying to sell my kid drugs than stabbing them any day. [/quote]

Trying to get to the root of your concern here.  If I follow correctly, you believe that:
1. The amount of violence (defined as getting shot or shanked) is WAY more at Gaithersburg HS than Wootton.
2. That the reason for that is many/most parents do not care about their kids.
3. If your goes to a school that is comprised of roughly 30% of students currently zoned for GHS, they are appreciably more likely to suffer violence in school.

Can you point to an instance of a shooting or stabbing that has occurred at Gaithersburg High School?  If you can find such an account, can you point to evidence that the child did not receive any consequences from the parents?
[/quote]

One of the first instances that came up using google. do you have google????
https://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2022/05/1-teen-hurt-another-in-custody-after-stabbing-near-gaithersburg-high-school/ Those were students at the school.

There are plenty more violent incidents-but i’m sure your internet works the same as mine.

The issue with the parents is just general-these parents are just checked out in general. So the “evidence” is that these kids are doing this in the first place. Also, I just saw a post that GHS staff made about trying to get the students to come to school on time which is apparently a pretty severe problem there. What does this tell you?

Have you ever worked in a school before? I have. Behavior problems take so much time out of instruction. Just dealing with someone being generally difficult is a huge problem and when you have a larger number of students and parents disinterested in school it obviously happens at a greater rate. [/quote]

Nope.  Show me an incident that happened at school.
The specific assertion I am questioning is that students are more likely to be "stabbed or shot" AT SCHOOL if a minority percentage of kids currently zoned for GHS are added to the population.  We can talk about instruction disruption, but that is a separate issue.  [/quote]

Wow-so this is totally fine since it was just slightly off school property?  Hope your kid never walks home or has to take a city bus!

Anyway, here is the incident where the 15 year old took a loaded gun TO SCHOOL. And now i’m done-you can google the array of SA’s I found that i’m not gonna post. I’m not sure  why you are denying that there is major violence at that school.  
https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/05/08/gaithersburg-high-loaded-gun/[/quote]

I'm stating the fact that nobody has been stabbed or shot in that school, which refutes the assertion that it is likely to happen to a Wootton kid, particularly if they are simply exposed to a minority population from GHS.

You may also consider looking at the geographic portion of the current GHS that could join Wootton kids at the new building and consider whether that is the population that is causing the hypothetical violent acts you reference and stereotype.[/quote]

Hypothetical? Interesting, because bringing a loaded gun to school seems pretty real and not hypothetical but ok.

Sure-the actual portion of the GHS feeder that is slotted to move to crown in option H is a small section and that’s exactly why they did it that way. Once the option goes into effect they can move whoever they want over there. crown is already slotted for expansion so the capacity will increase and therefore so will [b]the amount of kids redistricted there[/b] from GHS. One of the whole arguments of this option is that enrollment has gone down and is predicted to continue to decrease. So where else do you think they will get the kids to fill the school?[/quote]

School capacity and enrollment most frequently increases or decreases not as a result of redistricting, but rather the changing population within the district.  Given the recent development and type of housing around Crown, the most reasonable projection is that geographic area will generate more high school students in the coming years....not that the geographic area will expand.[/quote]

DP. So does this mean Crown will fill up organically over time without the need to move Wootton there to constitute 75% of the student body (and change the name to Wootton to fool people and enrich the real estate developers around Crown)?[/quote]

No.[/quote]

So the highly dense residential area immediately around Crown won’t result in hundreds of new students?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics