Reply to Barr and Durham

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr and Durham"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Y'all still think Durham is "on to something" - how quaint.[/quote]

Not only is he not onto anything, his case against Sussmann is collapsing while he's being forced to admit that he didn't bother to ask the OIG's office for information even though the OIG did investigations of many of the same events.  And, what do you know, the information the OIG had undermines the Durham's allegations against Sussmann![/quote]

Interesting take. 
Wrong, but interesting. [/quote]

I'd love to hear how finding out that Sussmann was taking similar claims to the OIG in the same time period, and openly disclosing his client, somehow helps Durham's case that Sussmann lied to Baker about whether he was representing a client. [/quote]

Still waiting on a thoughtful response to this. [/quote]

Lets see.  Perkins was a well known law firm that regularly represented Democrat Party and Democratic candidates.  And Sussman was a partner in that firm's DC office.  The idea that Baker had no idea that Sussman might have had Democratic ties is silly on the face.   And further the idea that the FBI does not second guess every tip that comes in the door is even more absurd.  I hope the FBI hears all sorts of grap, and it then tries to figure out what is really grap and what is not.  And now we know another part of the FBI had explicit knowledge of the connection.  So, Sussman is to blame because the FBI GC and the FBI IG did not talk to each other.   [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics