Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review Updates"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In previous rounds of boundary changes, if something didn't make logical sense, for sure there was something happening behind the scenes with the SB members.[/quote] I really don’t think that’s the case here. I think it’s just the incompetence of an outside firm with no familiarity of this region playing with puzzle pieces and going with the first piece that fits. To me, the only seemingly directed adjustment is Timber Lane to Falls Church, because it went against Thru’s established criteria, was thrown in at the zero hour, and relies on capacity numbers from the yet to be completed expansion. But I can see that recommendation coming from the superintendent’s office. [/quote] I kind of agree--especially since I think we've heard that the next maps will be very different. It looks to me like THRU has done this with no understanding of neighborhoods. Kind of like trying puzzle pieces and sometimes picking the wrong one and attempting to force fit it.[/quote] Cont. And, don't underestimate the power of your School Board members--especially your district rep. They generally control the decisions. They form coalitions. During the 2008 South Lakes study, Janie Strauss pretty much kept Dranesville out of any consideration even though she had areas very close to South Lakes. Kathy Smith joined with Stu Gibson and ponied up Sully students to go to Oakton from Chantilly. This enabled Gibson to take Fox Mill for South Lakes from Oakton. Otherwise, the Providence member (the guy with the double name) would have objected.[/quote] You’re talking about Phil Niedzielski-Eichner (he’s on the Planning Commission now), and the deal he cut with the others was to get part of Navy moved to Oakton from Chantilly in exchange for losing Fox Mill. He was afraid Oakton sports would suffer unless Oakton also picked up some kids. In retrospect, however, if some Chantilly kids hadn’t moved to Oakton back in 2008, Chantilly’s enrollment would have surpassed 3000 at some point. [/quote] I'm guessing Navy doesn't produce that many athletes, more like mathletes, LOL![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics