Reply to Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think they were talking about having to send their kids across the county, with repercussions for kids after school activities, traffic, drive times, time spent with family, and yes….property values.

You are intent on policing the language here while accusing others of shutting down dialogue.[/quote]

There are no victims. No boundaries have been redrawn. Complaining about victim blaming is preposterous.[/quote]

Ok, they used the word victim.  Would “those hurt by Option 3 if enacted” work better for you?[/quote]

No, because nobody has been "hurt" by option 3, at least not in any tangible way. Demanding we steal the wages of the consultants because of Option 3 is predatory and immoral.[/quote]

I think Flo Analytics has done a superbly bad job at releasing these maps, and not anticipating the fallout. Their actions show they don’t care about the communities that they have disrupted.  The name calling here is a direct result of their carelessness.  [/quote]

I'm not sure if it's Flo Analytics or MCPS CO staff who are responsible for the website, but this would have been so much clearer if, instead of being labeled as Options 1-4, they were labeled as something like A Scenario Emphasizing Stability, A Scenario Emphasizing Utilization, A Scenario Emphasizing Demographics, and A Scenario Emphasizing Proximity. Then they should have also clearly indicated that their goal is to come up with several options that would address as many of these various emphases as possible.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics