Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I check this thread all the time (maybe not daily, be t a few times a week) and I'm not sure I've EVER read a truly pro-Lively post. Do they get deleted?

I see three kinds of posts:

1) Poor Justin/Lively and Reynolds are evil/the NYT is evil/Lively is a liar/Baldoni's lawyer is a genius/Lively's lawyers are "mid"/etc.

2) Debate over who has the better legal case, sometimes with editorializing about the people involved, as sometimes not. Some of these could be considered pro-Lively in that they might argue Lively has a case or that alternatively Baldoni's case is weak. But none of them actually celebrate or compliment Lively. In fact many will be prefaced "I hate Blake Lively, but." They are usually just focused on the legal arguments. Also Mamy of the posts in this category attack Lively's case or argue Baldoni's case is stronger, but in the legal merits as opposed to just picking a team.

3) People who enjoy the gossip/drama but do not appear to take a side either way.

Never seen anyone actually try to argue Lively is great or she has a slam dunk case.[/quote]

Well she doesn't have a dlam dunk case so there's that[/quote]

I agree but also neither does he, yet when people post on this thread that he does, they don't get accused of being members of his pr team.[/quote]

I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone say he has a slam dunk case. Just that he was probably in the right and that his case looks stronger than some might think [/quote]
Idk people do have an energy that he's right it's worthless when people talk about other theories. [/quote]

You don’t have other theories. You have a lot of desire to repeatedly mistate facts. And yes, it’s you, and no, no one is going to give you a personal primer through his attorney’s point by point refutation of her lies. It’s not “theory of the case” stuff. And it’s damned clear. Sorry![/quote]

Stop yelling and swearing at people.

By the way, you are accusing this PP (who is not me) of being me. Log off, babe.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics