Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to ""No Labels" Party"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The No Labels organization keeps crying that Democrats who oppose them, "Why are you against democracy?" Yet the leaders will choose their presidential ticket in the equivalent of the old smoke-filled room. The Democratic and Republican primaries and caucuses elect delegates who choose their parties' nominees. (When there's an incumbent president, the party rarely has a contest, as in 1996, 2004, 2012, 2020 and now, but there have been such contests in 1968, 1980 and 1992.) Now they've gone to court to stop their own 15,000 Arizona No Labels Party voters from electing candidates for state and federal offices in a primary despite the law in Arizona. Why? That would force them to follow Arizona election laws and disclose their top-secret donors! https://apnews.com/article/no-labels-arizona-lawsuit-third-party-2024-d2761fdeb3f7ef5ef923c433c686d2d7 https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1349354/gov.uscourts.azd.1349354.1.0.pdf https://ballot-access.org/2023/10/19/no-labels-party-sues-arizona-secretary-of-state-to-block-the-state-from-holding-a-primary-for-no-labels/#comments[/quote] If you actually read the first article, it is apparent that the lawsuit is to stop a political dirty trick, an attempt by a partisan to work around state law to get the names of the No Labels donor list. Such a list would of course be useful for Democrats to directly pressure independents and moderates not to support anyone other than the annointed Joe Biden. How Democratic was the nomination process of Joe Biden in 2020? Some might argue that the Democratic Party establishment stepped in to save the Biden candidacy in South Carolina after he had been rejected by voters in Iowa and New Hampshire. And now, according to you, voters should not get a choice in 2024 either. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics