Reply to Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's not the unmasking that is illegal (although it is interesting that so many politicos asked for unmasking).  It is the leaking that is the problem.  That is the crime.[/quote]

What leaking?  Intel reports are meant to be shared and used and acted upon. That is what they are for. [b] Nothing was leaked.[/b] [/quote]

The transcript was leaked to Washington Post.  Leaking classified information is illegal.  David Ignatious was the reporter.[/quote]

You sound like Devin Nunes. Just sayin'.[/quote]

DP.
OMG.  You are seriously believing that no crime was committed in the leaking to the WaPo?  
Geez... the left wing media has done a total snow job on you......

And, so you know.  I will take anything Devin Nunes says over anything that the Democrats (particularly Schiff) say. 
Pretty much everything he has said has turned out to be true.  That is not the case with Schiff.   [/quote]

Nunes leaked the unmasking of ... himself.  Illegal and funny.

Leaking isn't great. But many of the most vocal are (purposefully) ignoring the substance of what was leaked.

Flynn's name was leaked in conjunction with the mendaciously described phone call. The transcript was requested but never produced.

But sure, focus on the leak.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics