Reply to FCPS Boundary Review Updates

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review Updates"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think the goal is to eliminate all split feeders. The goal is to eliminate the sliver splits.  The ones where only a few students split off - like 10%.  Those could be eliminated or expanded such that a higher percentage of a MS or ES class goes to the same school. [/quote]

What's frustrating is that Thru was hired and not given clear guidelines and priorities. If FCPS had told them "no split feeders, that's the first priority" or "no over capacity schools, that's the first priority" then the maps would make sense and we could guess what was going to happen next. [/quote]
They were given priorities. Top priority is removing attendance islands, which is the objective of Scenario 1. [b]Next priority is reducing split feeders, specifically in instances where the split is less than 20 (or is it 30)%[/b], so Scenario 2 is Scenario 1 plus split feeder mitigation. Third priority is capacity exceeding 105%, and Scenario 3 is Scenario 2 plus capacity shuffling.

Now, do they do this with any nuance or understanding of walk zones, community cohesion, or access across major roads and highways? No. But they technically do have priorities and have presented them as such. [/quote]

It seems so pointless, shuffling kids around when it makes no discernible difference whether 35 percent or 40 percent of a school feeds into another high school.[/quote]

I agree. Like someone posted that neighborhood that just has 10 or 20 kids living there. What's the point of messing with things like that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics