Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I do not think Lively has anything to hide from that audio, no. Do I think they cherrypicked the stuff that was the worst for SS, and omitted some context that might make his statements more understandable? Yes, probably, but if there was anything really bad for her they wouldn't have filed it. This was a completely optional submission by them, as part of an optional motion and I don't even think there was any deadline to file this one. It's not like this was even evidence she needed to defend herself against something. It was totally in her control, Ayoub wasn't involved in the movie or would have ever been considered relevant, they never had to bring this up at all if it hurt Lively's case.[/quote] Holding off on a full response to see what is released. If, and this an if, don’t come yelling if it doesn’t happen, the declaration is misleading because of what is omitted or lack of context, it will be “bad” for Blake. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
