Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Harris beating Trump in Iowa"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love this thread. Absolutely love it. So much hope (and artificially induced credibility!) invested in the ONE obscure, outlier poll. It carried the hopes and fever dreams of so many here. And it went down in flames like the Hindenburg. I love this thread. [/quote] I would love to meet the people posting to this thread arguing that they absolutely certain that this singular poll was correct and that Harris would win Iowa. Do they just cognitively memory hole all of this and compartmentalize? [/quote] Yes. Social justice warriors just ignore past misjudgments and invent new causes that are foolish. [/quote] It must take a special kind of person to just argue like crazy for something and then pretend it didn’t happen after. [/quote] DP, but she had a pretty good track record and it would've suggested that there was systematic bias out there, not being picked up elsewhere. She was obviously very wrong. Predictions markets weren't. Some of us can admit when there are errors and be more skeptical of polls like this (and polling in general going forward) and look to prediction markets as a better barometer of potential outcomes. Happy now? The next funny episode (already getting underway) will be when libs start yammering about blue waves in 2026 and 2028…. after spending the last two years telling us democracy will END and there will never be anymore elections if Trump wins. [/quote] Well he isn't in office yet so let's wait and see. I doubt you would ever say you were wrong if he did end elections[/quote] Not a single poster on this board has ever offered an even vaguely coherent explanation of exactly how Trump would “end elections.” It’s as if most of the people on this board have no idea how our government or political system actually work. [/quote][/quote] DP, but she had a pretty good track record and it would've suggested that there was systematic bias out there, not being picked up elsewhere. She was obviously very wrong. Predictions markets weren't. Some of us can admit when there are errors and be more skeptical of polls like this (and polling in general going forward) and look to prediction markets as a better barometer of potential outcomes. Happy now? [/quote] The only “systemic bias out there” is from the media against Trump.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
