Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Bethesda Soccer On Way Down"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Well if we’re giving grades for posts…you failed! Couple of those players were the fastest runners and ran 35-45 for the with previous beep tests. Heard that was about the ones who left last year. [quote=Anonymous]Heard those players quit because they don’t want to run .. to play soccer you have to run and be fit . No surprise there. Hope they find a soccer team that doesn’t run . [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Evaluation of Bethesda Soccer Club. Methodology (D) The player development approach lacks consistency and places little emphasis on individual growth. There is an overemphasis on winning rather than fostering skill development, which hinders long-term player progress. Quality (C) The club struggles to maintain high coaching standards, with many teams underperforming despite ample resources. While there are occasional flashes of quality, the performance is inconsistent across the board. Club Culture (F) The club is perceived as elitist and overly transactional, prioritizing revenue over community engagement. Poor communication and a lack of trust alienate both players and parents, undermining the sense of belonging. Leadership (D) Leadership appears more focused on maintaining appearances than addressing systemic problems. The board demonstrates a lack of accountability and has shown complacency in handling serious allegations, further eroding trust. Facilities (C) While the club has decent access to facilities, overcrowding often limits effective training sessions. The quality of facilities provided varies across teams, with some receiving priority treatment despite all paying the same fees. Vision (D) Although the club claims to have a vision for player development, execution is lacking. It positions itself as a pipeline for elite players but has few tangible results to support this claim. Competitiveness (B-) The club fields competitive teams in local leagues and tournaments, often achieving good results. However, elite-level teams have struggled recently, with success more often attributed to recruiting external talent rather than developing homegrown players. Ethics (F) The club faces serious ethical concerns, including allegations of favoritism, improper relationships, and win-at-all-costs behavior. Transparency is lacking, leaving families feeling powerless to challenge decisions. These issues have significantly tarnished the club’s reputation, with increasing parental complaints about fairness and ethics. Finances (B-) While the club generates significant revenue through high fees, there is little visible reinvestment in infrastructure, coaching quality, or player support. Executives are well-compensated, and coaches are permitted to generate additional income through side activities like training camps and clinics. Summary Bethesda Soccer Club suffers from critical issues in leadership, culture, and ethics, which undermine its potential as a premier soccer organization. Although it achieves some success on the field, this often comes at the expense of player development and community trust. Without substantial reforms in leadership, transparency, and methodology, the club risks further damage to its reputation and alignment with the values of modern youth soccer. Overall Grade: D+[/quote] Currently in Girls’ ECNL program. This review hits every nail on the head. One of the ECNL age groups just had four players quit over the last three weeks!!![/quote][/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics