Reply to TJ Falls to 14th in the Nation Per US News

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ Falls to 14th in the Nation Per US News"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think the unfortunate issue here are the academic results that are rolling in with the new process. Scores are much lower on SOLs and PSATs and achieved Math.

It also shows the new system isn’t selecting for geniuses that were left out because rich kids gamed the admissions. It actually confirms that the previous admits were just academically better students… in many areas. [/quote]

They were better test takers, no doubt about it - because the previous process overselected for test taking ability. It's no more complicated than that.

Doesn't mean they are necessarily smarter or more deserving of the opportunities that TJ provides, and it certainly doesn't mean that TJ was a better academic environment before.[/quote]
A lot of those kids did more than just take tests.

And id venture that it does mean they are smarter. Maybe the new process shows it selected for smarter kids as defined by some other metric that isn’t performance and knowledge displayed through curriculum and scores or competitions. I don’t know what that metric is though.

The school/process isn’t selecting the best anymore as commonly defined by standard academic performance. It’s selecting who they want. Two totally different things. And that’s fine.

I think many want to pretend they can have both, the performance of the previous reputation and the diversity that many want. The current selection process is over selecting URMs who perform poorly compared to non-URMs. A test and experience factors might give you both.

I don’t know which optics are worse however. Dropped academic results in the current approach or lopsided admissions scores in a test based approach that gives URM points.[/quote]

The largest increase was to white kids.  More than all other groups combined.
Pre-change white admits 86, most recent class 140 up by 54
Pre change black admits 7, most recent class 19, up by 12
Prechange hispanic admits16, most recent class 41, up by 25
Asian admits went down by 40 from 355 to 315
[/quote]

Do you have a breakdown of numbers of kids in each group from lower income homes? As long as we’re pulling in more kids from families that don’t have financial/educational advantages, what race the kids happen to be doesn’t really matter.

I care about seeing opportunities going to kids from less advantaged families. [/quote]

I don't have the racial breakdown of disadvantaged kids but here is where I'm puilling the info from:

https://www.fcps.edu/news/offers-extended-thomas-jefferson-high-school-science-and-technology-class-2028
It shows 16.36% disadvantaged (it used to be 2%). 
I'm with you.  If you want to discriminate based on wealth, that's fine.  I think we all understand there is an inherent unearned advantage to wealth.
It would not be offensive to correct for that at least a bit.[/quote]
As long as they use some sort of [b]objective, standardized metric[/b] to assess foundational skills in the admissions process. SOL, Math Inventory, something. With rampant grade inflation, GPA is no longer a reliable certification of solid foundational skills. It is undoubtedly stressful for the TJ students who are failing their SOLs; those gaps should have been identified earlier. [/quote]

I’d prefer not to see standardized tests added back to the process. There was a time that they were useful for identifying bright kids from families with fewer advantages, but that is unfortunately no longer true. The proliferation of test prep businesses has distorted the scores to the point where the tests become essentially of little to no worth to the TJ application process.

The new system is doing a good job of pulling in more kids from financially less advantaged families; let’s hope this trend continues and increases. The kids who need an opportunity like TJ are the kids from families who are not advantaged financially/educationally. Kids whose parents are well educated and financially comfortable will have no trouble doing well in this world. The kids whose parents didn’t go to college and have lower incomes are the ones for whom TJ can really make a difference. 
[/quote]

Your first paragraph is directly contrary to the best research on testing.  Very selective colleges that tried "test optional" decided that to go back to requiring test scores.  it turns out that GPA is a really bad predictor of academic ability without test scores while test scores are a pretty good predictor of academic ability regardless of GPA.  https://opportunityinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/SAT_ACT_on_Grades.pdf

The new system is not doing a good job of selecting for academic ability, it is selecting random kids.  You can select for economically disadvantaged kids without selecting them through a lottery process.  Just use the 1.5% criteria and give FARM kids a preference.  Or are you afraid that too many of the poor kids are going to be asian.

You entirely miss the point of what TJ does and who it helps.  The shitty GPA a random poor kid with a 3.5 middle school GPA gets from TJ will not help them compared to getting a high GPA from their base school.  It really only helps the tail end smart kid who never had the resources (and in a district like FCPS, why don't they have those resources?) but would sop up the learning like a sponge if only they were exposed to it.  I doubt it's 1.5% of every school but the courts say it's legal for now.

Schools like TJ are special ed for kids who are academically gifted and would wither without the accelerated curriculum.  You are trying to appropriate a reputation for excellence built by people with good test scores and give it to kids based on skin color.  Sure a lot of those kids are not poor but they're not wealthy, there are very few bmws in the student parking lot.  Wealthy families have better options.[/quote]

You vastly overrate TJ. It's a fine school with hardworking slightly above average students.[/quote]

Slightly above average students?  
With an average SAT score of 1520?  
GTFOH, you're full of sh*t!
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics