Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Feedback on Next Level Lacrosse?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]On roster size for the younger teams, a lot can depend on the strength of the team and how deep the team goes into the roster in a typical game. So if you take some of the younger NL teams that are really strong and win most games by a number of goals regardless of who on the roster they play, the whole roster gets a good amount of playing time. If you couple that with the fact that club teams play a lot of games now even at the youth level with many clubs playing 40 games or more a year counting fall, winter, spring, and summer, the playing time of a slightly larger roster can make a lot of sense. But if you are on a team that seeks to win at the higher levels and is only competitive when they limit the roster to like the top 16 you’ll have a completely different experience. So really the context matters a lot and it is hard to tell if a roster is too large just from the raw numbers.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
