Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Neutral question, while file this recording as an audio file, why wasn't a transcript used like for a deposition or the transcripts of BF on various talk shows?[/quote]

I don't know about the BF talk show transcripts (I wasn't aware they'd been filed int his case) but deposition transcripts are easy to file because depositions are attended by a court reporter who takes an official transcript. I think the process of creating a transcript of audio evidence can be a bit more complicated because you need to have it transcribed AND in a case like this where it's just an amateur recording, there may be a dispute about the transcription (some things might be garbled, there may be times when people are talking over each other, a company that uses voice recognition software can be glitchy and inaccurate).

Don't ask me what the proper procedure is because I don't actually know, but I know it's different than it is for a depo because the transcription is less straightforward than one taken by an officer of the court who is presumed to have made an accurate and true documentation.[/quote]

That makes sense regarding the court reporter. With one of the sanctions motions they did include professional transcripts of BF on Megyn Kelly and others. I actually thought Lively had filed both here (the Sarowitz recording and a transcript) but maybe it was just the audio, which is annoying. This is a case where the CCs could actually come in handy if they can respectfully email chambers and get a copy.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics