Reply to Seriously with the book banning ?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Seriously with the book banning ?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The list of books banned in Florida is publicly available (and it’s been linked and discussed on this thread, though it’s been ignored by the fascists) and it’s not smut. It’s multicultural books. Books that acknowledge gay people as humans. Books that talk about the contributions of women and not White people to our culture, to technology. Books that talk about age appropriate sexuality, things like consent (i.e., your body is your body and people can’t touch it without your permission) and appropriate names for body parts.

So basically everything that Republicans fear. [/quote]
+1 Stop pretending this is about porn, it’s not.
[twitter]https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs/status/1634183427954991105?s=61&t=I7ZozTDGmPOsC7cmSRxwgA[/twitter][/quote]

It’s their typical BS arguments.  They try to minimize it but everyone knows what’s happening.[/quote]

If it’s not about porn for you, Why not agree that graphic depictions Of sexual activity not be provided by the government to other people’s children? [/quote]

So you obviously don't believe in sex ed.

Also the government is not "giving" those kids books. Their parents have every right to say "my child cannot check out or read this book." You are trying to ban books for OTHER people's children.

What if a group decided to ban the Little House on the Prairie books because of harmful stereotypes of Indians? Do they have that right to decide your kids shouldn't be exposed to material they feel is harmful?[/quote]

We are not talking stereotypes from little house on the prairie. We are talking about the graphic depiction of sexual acts. Stay on topic. You are free to provide this material to your children. Why are you so invested in providing this content to other people’s children? Please answer this question.[/quote]

Are only photos graphic? But verbal descriptions ok? Define graphic. I'm a woman and prefer reading erotica to visuals so if you're assuminf pictures are bad, but words are ok, it depends on the person. If you're going with words = graphic, that's quite a slippery slope[/quote]

You like erotica. Great. Explain to me why it must be provided to children in schools.[/quote]

I didn't say it must be.

Define graphic. Define what verbal descriptions of sex are allowed vs not? Or is it just pictures that bother you? [/quote]

So now you are against providing erotica to kids in school? Sounds to me like you are a book banner. Why do you hate the 1st amendment.[/quote]

Rolls eyes. Define what version of graphic is ok or not. Stull waiting for your definition.[/quote]
Frankly I haven’t seen Republicans supply the titles of any books routinely supplied to school children that contain graphic anything. [/quote]

DP.  Spare us.  It's been posted repeatedly, you just refuse to watch this video.  Gosh, can't imagine why...

[twitter]https://twitter.com/tarynfenske/status/1633499837659516928?s=20[/twitter][/quote]

That night be more convincing if conservatives weren’t fighting bans on marriage under age 18 around the country. Clearly you all have no problem with children having sex as long as there’s a ring involved. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics