Reply to How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, so much for qualified

[twitter]https://twitter.com/AmerIndependent/status/1316425454128070662[/twitter][/quote]

My g-d, this is embarrassing.[/quote]

So interesting that you select one tiny moment and completely dismiss the hours she has spoken at length about the Constitution and the many cases she has been involved in - all without notes.  But I’m not surprised.  [/quote]

One tiny moment? It is the First Amendment. She is a "law professor."

[b]there is NO law professor of merit [/b]who wouldn't know this like the back of their hand.

It is sad that people think this is ok for a nominee to the Supreme Court.[/quote]

This is just bs.  People forget for moments.  Hell, my Con Law wrote the friggin' book that the VAST majority of law students have used for over 30 years forgot basics like that  just like any other normal person.  Jim Eustice, another of my professors, forgot stuff.  Don't be an idiot.[/quote]

ITA.  I have been very impressed at how she can recall details of cases, some of which she decided, some of which she didn't, with such detail.  She is whip smart.  And, is able to discuss law in a very understandable way.  I would have loved to take a class from her.  [/quote]

I don't think you understand the meaning of the term. Whip smart law professors know the five protections of the first amendment. Whip smart law professors are up on current events. Whip smart law professors of integrity would never subject themselves or their family to a nomination under these circumstances.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics