Reply to RBG Politcal Discussion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "RBG Politcal Discussion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So Murkowski and Collins are already out in favor do waiting.  We need 3 people out this way to wait.

My sad prognosis is that these two rushing up front were doing so so they don’t have to be number 3. No one will be number 3. Such a sad shame. Could the historians in the room share some perspective?  I’m just an engineer. [/quote]

There needs to be 4. With only 3 Pence would break a tie. I wouldn't hold my breath.[/quote]

What’s wrong with everyone doing their job and replacing the deceased SCOTUS justice? That’s their job. 
Chips of death fall where they fall.
[/quote]

So put Merrick Garland on the court as he should be.[/quote]
Exactly.  If they wanted a truce, that's what they would do.  The fact that js not even a consideration is the problem.[/quote]

Isn’t Metrick a woman? We need a woman or PoC. [/quote]
Like I said, if they wanted a truce, they know what to do.[/quote]

Lol.  A truce?  Politics is war by other means.  McConnell isn't dumb enough to believe there's ever going to be any sort of truce.[/quote]
You know exactly what I mean, so don't pretend you don't and that McConnell isn't making deliberate choices knowing what the consequences of each path are.[/quote]

Sorry, I really don't.  "I'm telling you [opposing political side], if you exercise the political power you currently hold in a legal manner to advance the agenda of your side, just wait until we have and exercise political power!"

I'm pretty sure McConnell knows that if and when Dems get political power necessary to push their agenda, they'll marshall that power to the maximum they are able (except as they are unable to cobble together internal coalitions or fear blowback from moderate voters) and any promises of "restraint" now are illusory and should be ignored.  I'm pretty sure if Dems take the Senate they will give less than two shots about how the republican minority feels about their actions.  [/quote]
No, that's not how it works.  These are choices they are making.  These deals used to be made all the time.  Now they choose not to.  You don't have to make a deal for something in the future.  You can exchange current values.  Trump and McConnell don't make those deals either.  Their choice. He is deciding where his interests lie.  They don't lie with making deals, so he makes none.  He will keep doing that for as long as it is in his interest to do so.[/quote]

Given the last four years, I don't see how either side could trust the other with a deal at the present moment.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics