Reply to Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ?

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Option B Alternate - Adding extra ES to WJ? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For what it is worth, Farmland / Luxmanor did have multiple realtors as part of the petition and at public hearing. [/quote]

Are there certain professions that are forbidden from advocating that their kids get good education?[/quote]

Certainly not but these individuals noted do not have children in the system so their motivations are seemingly different. And even they did, reasonable people can assume bias.[/quote]

It was a public hearing. I find it hard to believe that anyone that talked in front of BOE did not have a kid in one of the affected schools. Point us to the video, or this is just another false accusation, similar to the earlier one on this thread.

[/quote]

[b]At the 2/24 meeting, the first video testimony was submitted by a woman with NO kids currently in MCPS.[/b]

At the 2/24 and 3/3 meeting there was a realtor giving the same talking points whose youngest child is a senior at WJ.[/quote]

Her child is registered for K next year at VMES. Who tf are you?[/quote]

Still not a current parent. Doesn’t come to PTA meetings or other schooo events such as the carnivals, art night where Laura Stewart showed up. Still could be working their way to another ES option that still exists before 2027z

Any taxpayer should be able to share their views regardless of where they live or if they even have kids in MCPS. We all benefit from a safe, safe educated society. The problem is when people’s views are so narrow that they can’t include anyone outside of their own personal experiences.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics