Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "TJ Falls to 14th in the Nation Per US News"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]0.6%, <1%, of the class of 2024 came from a low-income family. They wanted to eliminate the inequitable admissions process. And look who benefited the most - Asian students from low-income families. [/quote] They wanted to balance race. This is clear from the email and text traffic between the FCPS board members. And in the process... Asian admissions dropped even as the class size grew larger. White admissions rose the most. Between the last year under the old system and the most recent class: white admissions rose by 54 (more than all other racial groups combined) black admissions rose by 12 hispanic admissiosns rose by 25 multiracial rose by 7 asian admissions dropped by 40 To be fair the county is mostly white so [b]if are trying to be more representative of the county[/b] you are going to get more white kids. But you are selecting for race not merit.[/quote] should it be more representative of the demographic makeup of the county or the applications? If 95% of the applications for varsity ice hockey team are white students, or if 95% of the applications to high school basketball team are black students, or if 95% of the applications to math counts team are asian students, should the selected make-up in each of those teams still be based on county racial composition? [/quote] If they did it based on applications, that would lower the current # of Asian students, as they are admitted at a higher rate than average. [/quote] It roughly approximates the applicant pool. Most of the applicant pool is asian. I haven't been able to find data on the applicant pool for more recent years but the first year after the change,: Asians were 51% of the pool and 54% of admitted students Blacks were 9% of the pool and 7% of the admitted students Hispanics were 10% of the pool and 11% of admitted students Whites were 24% of the pool and 22% of admitted students Multiracial were 7% of the pool and 5 % of admitted students The year before change: Asians 56% of the pool and 73% of admitted students Blacks were 6% of the pool and 2% of admitted students Hispanics were 8% of the pool and 3% of admitted students Whites were 23% of the pool and 18% of admitted students Multiracial were 6% of the pool and 6% of admitted students This process was driven by a desire to create racial balance at TJ.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics