Reply to Biden wants RTO

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Biden wants RTO"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The government also has an interest in running well, which surpasses DC’s interests.  As it should.  Federal employees are not going to turn around CRE. That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.  Private sector is hiring and figuring out ways to deal with the labor market that exists.  The government needs to follow their lead if they want to retain or hire. Commercial real estate investors can pivot to the burbs.  Everyone else did.[/quote]

+ My private sector DH and neighbors are all still full time WAH. And they make a lot more than me. Making GS level employees like me go into DC even a few days a week isn’t going to save CRE or failing businesses. We don’t collectively make enough to keep DC afloat and the government risks losing good employees to private sector jobs. Even if they land in a private sector job that requires in office days, they’ll make more $ to counteract the commute.

WAH is basically the reason I’m at my job as a working mom of 3. This literally could be the difference of whether I stay in government, possibly even the workforce. (Before you ask, my kids were in daycare before the pandemic so commuting wasn’t as bad). But now that they are school age and their school has an extended day waitlist we haven’t been able to make it off for 3 years (employee shortage due to the post-COVID labor market) and they have early activities beginning around 5 pm, I have really come to rely on WAH. (DH also WAH but can’t start/end his day early like me). I know I’m not alone and collectively the government could lose a lot of qualified employees.[/quote]

Someone else would happily do your job. None of us are owed or entitled to federal employment.[/quote]

You are absolutely wrong about this.  Yes, someone without my qualifications and experience would be happy to have the money.  But they can’t do the job. So there’s the rub.[/quote]

So move on, if you don’t like the federal government coming back to the office in DC please go do something else. Many of us are glad to be back in the office and think this is good policy.[/quote]

I will.  As Will others.  And then you e got a massive problem. Stop putting your head in the sand. A one size fits all solution — everybody back 6 days a PP— is not going to work.[/quote]

I’ve been a fed for more than 20 years and have listened to so many versions of “if x is elected, if they change this policy, if y happens EVERYONE WILL LEAVE!” Meanwhile federal attrition has been pretty flat over the years and the retirement wave of older feds that I heard about back in grad school never happened. It’s not a bad deal, we have more flexibility than most with decent pay and benefits. Before the pandemic I was required to be in my office 4 days a week, now we’re coming back 2 days a week. Seems like a win to me, we’d be lucky if we had certain people leave but there won’t be a serious exodus over this.[/quote]

+1.

I've been a fed since the Reagan administration and it's always been we're underpaid compared to the private sector, everyone will leave if such and such happens, and guess what?  It's rare when someone actually leaves the fed.  Yes they might change to a different agency, but they aren't leaving the fed because despite all the 24/7 nose to the grindstone federal employees here on DCUM, it's a gravy train.  I'm the first to admit it!  Generous leave, a great 401K with 5% matching, cheap life insurance, not the best health insurance but can't complain about the choices, now free parental leave, flexibility, etc.  [/quote]

Say two feds who entered the workforce in the EIGHTIES, bought their homes when housing and education for their kids were just a small fraction of what they are now.  [b]Dear god. Retire.  Please.[/b][/quote]

Different topic for a different thread but... why? Why do you hate older workers? [/quote]

Nope.  They need to retire because they are managers [b]who are completely out of touch with the needs and constraints of their workforce[/b].[/quote]

And you are better than them? [/quote]

I know more about what people who aren’t close to retirement need in a job. Seems a core bit of knowledge that they might need to consider before making decisions.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics