Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Seriously with the book banning ?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The list of books banned in Florida is publicly available (and it’s been linked and discussed on this thread, though it’s been ignored by the fascists) and it’s not smut. It’s multicultural books. Books that acknowledge gay people as humans. Books that talk about the contributions of women and not White people to our culture, to technology. Books that talk about age appropriate sexuality, things like consent (i.e., your body is your body and people can’t touch it without your permission) and appropriate names for body parts. So basically everything that Republicans fear. [/quote] +1 Stop pretending this is about porn, it’s not. [twitter]https://twitter.com/theplumlinegs/status/1634183427954991105?s=61&t=I7ZozTDGmPOsC7cmSRxwgA[/twitter][/quote] It’s their typical BS arguments. They try to minimize it but everyone knows what’s happening.[/quote] If it’s not about porn for you, Why not agree that graphic depictions Of sexual activity not be provided by the government to other people’s children? [/quote] So you obviously don't believe in sex ed. Also the government is not "giving" those kids books. Their parents have every right to say "my child cannot check out or read this book." You are trying to ban books for OTHER people's children. What if a group decided to ban the Little House on the Prairie books because of harmful stereotypes of Indians? Do they have that right to decide your kids shouldn't be exposed to material they feel is harmful?[/quote] We are not talking stereotypes from little house on the prairie. We are talking about the graphic depiction of sexual acts. Stay on topic. You are free to provide this material to your children. Why are you so invested in providing this content to other people’s children? Please answer this question.[/quote] All books passed the Milker test.[/quote] So your position is that anything passing the miller test should be provided to children in schools?[/quote] Define "provided". You seem to be suggesting some evil librarians and teachers are handing these books out to little children. Sorry, pal. That's not happening. Congrats on joining a long line of "smut" banners. History tends to laugh at you.[/quote] What does history have to say about people who introduce graphic sexual material to children? [/quote] You seem incapable of defining what constitutes "graphic." Does graphic include onky verbal descriptions or not? Still waiting. Maybe go read a Judy Blume book while you wait. Try "Forever" or "Then again Maybe I won't." They were in your highschool libraries. Define geaphic [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics