Reply to Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To recap:

Trump knew large numbers of people in the crowd were armed—or auto told Meadows and Hutchinson.

Trump wanted the armed crowd to move toward the Capitol and “stop the steal”.

The VP and the Speaker were at the Capitol.

Trump knew there were threats against the VP and didn’t ask supporters to be peaceful and stay away from the Capitol—he encouraged them to go there and fight, naming the VP as someone who didn’t do what needed to be done to stop the election.

The violent crowd within 40 ft of the VP.

If he had been killed, I would say Trump could be tried for felony murder. Luckily the VP wasn’t killed.  It was “just” a failed coup.

[/quote]

You forgot the part where Trump asked for additional forces and was turned down.[/quote]
Imagine that. Nancy adamantly refused the National Guard on standby. Why??[/quote]
Jesus Christ, we’ve talked about this for a year and a half. Nancy Pelosi is not in charge of the national guard. Neither is Muriel Bowser, since that’s probably your next ancient argument.[/quote]
Actually, both Bowser and Pelosi said they did NOT want the National Guard, which Trump had authorized.[/quote]

Not true. Stop lying. This has been debunked a hundred times on here but you dupes are hopeless. [/quote]
Google is your friend. [/quote]

Truth should be yours.  YouTube is not a credible fact checking source. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics